| Inconspicuous Consumption |
|
Drive 10,000 miles a year in a Mazda3 1.6 and, at current prices, it’ll cost you £2500 in fuel over three years. Drive the same distance in a Ford Focus 1.6 – which offers much the same performance and accommodation as the Mazda, and costs about the same – and you’ll have to spend nearly £500 more in fuel because the Focus is less economical. And that’s if you drive sensibly: drive badly and you can easily burn 50% more fuel. First published in CarBuyer, 2004 Choose the right car, drive the right way and you could make big savings on your fuel bills. Here’s how. The difference between an economical car driven well and a less efficient machine driven insensitively could easily amount to £1000 a year – plus the time and inconvenience of having to fill up twice as often. Fuel is the most obvious cost of running a car, the most frequent and the most visible bill you have to pay to stay mobile. And yet few people do much to minimise their fuel costs, despite the big savings to be had by choosing a car wisely and driving it with economy in mind. The further you drive and the most expensive fuel gets, the more you’ll save. Choosing an economical car is made easier thanks to Government legislation introduced in the 1970s which required manufacturers to supply fuel consumption figures for every new model, and laid down strict testing regimes to ensure that the figures were comparable for all cars. Figures were published for urban driving and constant speeds of 56mph and 75mph, given in miles per gallon or mpg. Today those tests have been refined to give us three different fuel consumption measurements, called the Urban Cycle, Extra-Urban Cycle and Combined figures, set out in EU Directive 93/116. But just how are these different fuel consumption figures arrived at, what do they mean, and how can they be used to choose an economical car? The tests explained All the tests are carried out in a laboratory, either by an independent testing organisation or by the manufacturer itself. All the test labs are inspected and approved, and some of the tests are independently witnessed to ensure fairness. The test cycles themselves are the same as those used to measure the official CO2 emissions figures which are now used for vehicle taxation. The Urban Cycle fuel consumption figure, as its name suggests, represents fuel consumption in town driving and consists of a sequence of stop-start and steady-speed motoring from a cold start with a maximum speed of 31mph and an average speed of 12mph. The test covers 2.5 miles. The Extra-Urban figure represents out-of-town driving. About half of its 4.3-mile length is covered at steady speed, the rest being acceleration, braking and idling. The Combined figure is the fuel consumption over the whole 6.8 miles of the Urban and Extra-Urban tests combined together, giving an average figure over a wide range of driving conditions. Where these three official figures help is that they make it easy to compare different cars, knowing that each one has been tested in the same way. By law all new cars in showrooms must carry a label detailing their official fuel consumption figures, and dealers must be able to supply customers with fuel consumption data on request or face a fine of up to £5000. Adverts and sales brochures which refer to fuel consumption must also quote all three fuel consumption figures both in miles per gallon and in litres per kilometre (which is more commonly used in Europe). Choosing an economical car If you spend most of your time driving in town, pay particular attention to the Urban Cycle figure. If most of your motoring avoids town-centre jams, the Extra-Urban figure will probably be more important. The Combined figure is more useful where you expect the car to be used in a wide variety of locations and driving conditions, from traffic jams to the open road, and it’s the most widely quoted. This is the figure you’ll find in the ‘Fuel Economy’ column of Carbuyer’s new car data section. Hidden in the lists of fuel consumption data are some general rules for choosing a car with good fuel economy. Don’t buy a car that’s bigger than you need, for instance: a heavier car uses more fuel each time it accelerates, and a physically bigger car burns up more fuel because it has to push more air out of the way as it moves. Both factors are particularly true of 4x4s, which are built heavy for strength and tall for practicality. So don’t buy an off-roader unless you intend to drive it off-road. Generally you should avoid automatic transmissions if you want to achieve the best economy. Autos are much more efficient than they used to be, but even now most of them will give a car poorer fuel consumption than a manual gearbox. Tall gearing, on the other hand, helps lower engine revs during motorway cruising and can help to reduce fuel consumption as well as engine noise. If you plan on using the car for lots of motorway miles, scan the spec sheet for ‘mph per 1000rpm’ in top gear: the bigger the number the better. At the other end of the scale, hybrids like Toyota’s Prius and Honda’s Civic IMA and Insight are more economical than most conventional petrol-engined cars in urban conditions. Hybrids are powered by petrol engines but also have an electric motor which can assist the engine during acceleration. The petrol engine is automatically switched off when the car is stationary in traffic. In the real world While the official figures are helpful for comparing cars, they don’t necessarily predict accurately the fuel consumption you will achieve, for several reasons. First, cars are mass-produced and no matter how effective the manufacturer’s quality control systems are, each one is slightly different. Two cars of exactly the same specification can produce different fuel consumption figures simply through minute differences in their construction. Second, the cars are generally tested when still new: the rules say only that they must be run-in and must have covered at least 1800 miles. When a car gets older it may not be as efficient or as consistent in its fuel consumption, and the deterioration will be more marked if servicing is skimped. Weather and traffic conditions also play a huge part in determining fuel consumption. The official tests are carried out in a lab, where conditions are ‘perfect’. Out on the road you might encounter headwinds, heavy traffic, roadworks, delays and all manner of other irritations which do your blood pressure – and your car’s fuel consumption – no good at all. But the biggest influence on fuel consumption is the way you drive. Harsh acceleration, poor observation and driving in the wrong gear all make a big impact on the amount of fuel your car uses. See our box on ‘Driving for Economy’ for tips on how to save fuel. Testing the Tests The official tests are fine for comparing cars, because every car is tested in exactly the same way. But do the figures bear any resemblance to those you can expect to return in the real world? We decided to find out, by comparing the official figures with our own set of fuel consumption measurements. The car we used was an Audi A3 with the 2.0FSI petrol engine. The Audi’s clever FSI direct-injection system – which has much in common with diesel engine technology – gives it the potential for excellent fuel economy, but also good performance thanks to a maximum power output of 150ps. The Audi’s official Urban figure is 29.4mpg. In very heavy traffic we recorded less than 20mpg, but away from rush-hour congestion (though still in town) the Audi returned up to 35.9mpg. So the official figure is near the middle of our range of results. We’d expect most A3 2.0FSI drivers to return around 30mpg in town driving. In our real-world version of the Extra-Urban test, we recorded fuel consumption figures which varied widely. Using all the Audi’s performance on the open road meant we could only travel 24 miles on every gallon, but keeping to the official Extra-Urban test’s average speed of 39mph and driving with economy in mind the A3 produced an excellent 62.4mpg. The Audi’s official Extra-Urban figure is 53.3mpg, which is certainly achievable on the road – though we expect most Audi drivers would be inclined to use the performance available, and that would probably result in higher fuel consumption. Even so, 45mpg should be easily achievable most of the time, without dawdling. The official ‘Combined’ figure, a weighted average of the Urban and Extra-Urban numbers, is 38.2mpg. Our best results give a combined figure of 49.2mpg. So the official figures can be bettered, but as we’ve said elsewhere, insensitive driving and traffic jams will quickly cause the figure to drop. Drive for Economy
|